Hi all -
I have been trying to understnad the logic behind why changing menus is so involved, where as there is an actual editor for this provided by Mystic and other BBS software. I can see the power of making menus run off JavaScript, but for those of us who know next to nothing about the language, have low vision and/or prefer the WYSIWYG of a dynamic menu system makes changing your > BBS into something more unique a snap. I've been running Synchronet on my
lab VM and Mystic on my production host. The only reason I went with Mystic is for the menu "overcomplexity".
Did I basically just say "Synchronet is not for me", or is this something that could be incorporated as perhaps a secondary option for menu creation/editing?
I have been trying to understnad the logic behind why changing menus is so involved, where as there is an actual editor for this provided by Mystic and other BBS software. I can see the power of making menus run off JavaScript, but for those of us who know next to nothing about the language, have low vision and/or prefer the WYSIWYG of a dynamic menu system makes changing your BBS into something more unique a snap. I've
Did I basically just say "Synchronet is not for me", or is this something that could be incorporated as perhaps a secondary option for menu creation/editing?
| Sysop: | LaF0rge |
|---|---|
| Location: | Berlin, Germany |
| Users: | 154 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 72:26:58 |
| Calls: | 1,037 |
| Calls today: | 1,037 |
| Files: | 12 |
| U/L today: |
13 files (32,779K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
1,434 files (1,709M bytes) |
| Messages: | 25,858 |
| Posted today: | 31 |